|
pakho113
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Country: Hong Kong Birthday: 11/3/1986 Gender: Male
Interests: Cooking,eating,saxophone,
piano,basketball,movies,music,
shopping(window,but will enjoy
real shopping if i can afford),
daydreaming,laughing,crying,
whatever-ing Expertise: personality reading,daydreaming
 Occupation: Student Industry: Art
Message: message me Website: visit my website
Member Since:
3/8/2005
|
|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| 今日想開始做qualitative research既功課, 一落筆,見到自己已經冇左"i think"呢個以前一定會係pre -editing version出現既字眼, 就諗起internship時學到過既所有野....
做social science既學生,好多時都會講"i think", "it seems"...係學校用當然冇問題, 因為lecturer or tutor 都唔會咬文嚼字咁去改essay, 但係一出去做事,每一句"i think","it seems", "我覺得", "同"好似"都會俾人一種你乜都唔識既感覺.
其中一樣我學到既野, 而我好努力係internship之後要achieve既野, 就係 - 做大學生要似大學生, 最起碼寫同講既野都要有100%既肯定, 如果唔係只會俾人一種 "你老吹ja ma", or "你講呀?"既感覺, 而呢d野, 我諗其實係每個大學生都應該識既野...
我好多謝Nicole係我既internship入面提醒左我呢一點,一個好多大學生都仍然犯既錯,
"i think", "it seems" - never should it be written on your assignments, never should it be used when you are thinking, because it just showed how naive your mindset is, or showed how self-centred you are as a person
| | |
| 情況是, 沒有後退的可能, 要往前走,卻有太多的變數
過濾過, 卻仍有太多選擇, 怕的是顧此失彼, 怕的是誤用光陰, 怕的是再一次嘆息
情況是, 最糟亦不會很糟,
只是, 要選對的,才能從後趕上
| | |
| back from bangkok for a 3-day trip going to have my internship on the first monday of June and yes, the internship that i have been dreaming so long...YEAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! | | |
| Are we Victim of fate? Or we made all our choices by ourselves? According to Alfred Adler (1958), we people are free to act, determine our fate and personality and thus affect our style of life. People attain different ability through heredity and can make use of these abilities on what the environment has given to create their own life. However, while the statement sounds optimistic enough, it seems that it is not always the case. Alfred Adler (1958) proposed that there will be feeling of superiority inspired when people overcome their feelings of inferiority by dealing with different personal problems. Through this way, people can creatively shape their own life and thus have the power to determine their own fate instead of being a ‘victim of fate’. The idea of creative self suggested by Adler (1958) is true in certain circumstances. Sometimes, people complain about their lives in a way they pretend to be having no choice to choose from at the first place. But the fact is, at least according to Adler (1958), these people have made their choice at the very first place and they just pretend they do not have a choice to ease their feeling of dissatisfaction in life. A very typical example occurs in school is, students used to tell others how tired they got after an overnight revision and were thus worried for not performing well in the examination due to the lack of sleep. However, these students were actually trying to find an excuse for themselves in case they failed the examination they would not feel that bad because they would be able to tell themselves they were just too tired. As suggested by Adler (1958), these students actually had choices. Had they started revision earlier, they would not have had to stay up so late. On top of that, they also knew, even then they spent a whole night revision, they could not cram much within just one night. Their “overnight revision” was just an excuse for their indifference in study and resultant poor result. Unfortunately, ‘fate’ is a word means too much to be just an excuse. While Adler’s statement is true on people having choice but choose a choice for an easy excuse, in many more other circumstances, people just do not have much choice. Being a person who has never made my choice based on the ability to make excuse out of it, I have been to a situation where no choice could be made. Kam was a friend of mine who I have known since I was 12 years old. Kam has been a really lazy person and he never had revision even there was an examination going on the next day. While both of us did not attain good result in the HKAL examination, his result was way worse than me. Not only did he not manage to attain ‘pass’ for the two AL subject, but he also failed the two AS level language subject with U grades. On the other hand, although I have failed two AL subject too, I managed to attain C grades for both languages subject. I may not be much smarter than Kam, but judging from the result of HKAL examination, at least I was not a bit worse or less talented than he was. However, just because he is of a really rich family background and his family has got a really good social network, while I stayed at Hong Kong studying for a degree that does not even provide me a proper GPA system and this was the best choice I had made at that time, Kam got an offer from an Australian university. I am not trying to complain how unfair it was for a less-talented people to receive a better offer than I could, however, this example proves that not all people can make a choice. Of course, one can argue, I could have tried harder and thus got an offer from a better university, however, whether I have attained a better result should not be affecting my ability to make a choice later if we people are as free to make a choice as Adler suggested. Moreover, had I worked harder and got better result, I would not be fit into this comparison with Kam, a lazy student who chose to work lazily and thus got a result worse than mine but manage to pick a better choice later for who his family members are. Kam’s situation also demonstrated that not only can we not make choice freely, our capability to make the choice we like is not restricted from our ability or hard work or even the choice made earlier, instead, our capability to make choice is actually more related to our family background or social status of the family- at least at the young age which we cannot do much yet to climb ourselves up on the social ladder. But can we choose which family we were given born to? Certainly not. For a lot of people, there are not many choices to choose from, when we talk about choice, we are talking about “good choice, better choice, best choice, bad choice, worse choice, worst choice”, people like Kam, who have advanced family background, could choose the best choice such as studying at a university where environment and academic reputation are both excellent, or he could choose the worst choice to go astray and became a drug dealer. What Kam can choose from is what we call “choice”. But in many people like me, who does not have the advanced family background, in a lot of times, we are choosing from “bad choice, worse choice, worst choice”, are these really choices which we can choose freely? Absolutely not, this is more of a “compromise” than a “choice”. Actually, there are still numerous things in our life not up to our choices. Can we choose how we look like? Not really unless you choose to do a plastic surgery, but before you do that, you have to save enough money for this expensive choice. To have such an expensive surgery done, you have to be employed with a high profile company so as to be paid well. However, according to The Economist (2007), latest studies have proven that beautiful people are more capable to get a well-paid job than those ugly ones. And if ugly people cannot get a well-paid job at the very first place, they are not very likely to accumulate enough money within foreseeable period to make their own choice of how they want themselves to be looking like. Or can we choose a better brain so we are cleverer? Not likely. Can we choose our nationality? Not likely unless you apply for the nationality and have fulfilled the strict requirement, but you cannot make this choice when you are teenagers unless your family again, have advanced background. After all, we do have choices sometimes, at least we can choose to look at the vulnerability in life as challenges and thus be happier. However, in a lot of times, we are just not capable to make choices. Perhaps the choices are equally bad, or we are making “compromises” rather than “choices”. Rich or better-off people are still always the one who can make most “choices” available for them, leaving the worse-off people and the poor having only “compromises”, the ability to choose a choice does not even necessarily related to personal ability or personal talent. But finally, at least Adler(1958) is right about something, we can always look at things the way we like to, this is one of the very few things, if any, we can choose. We can look at unpleasant incident as they are challenges or other optimistic interpretation such as “this is so cool that I come across difficulties!” or other pessimistic interpretation such as “this is so sad”. We really do have a choice on how we interpret these things, these are our choices. But, when you experience traumatic difficulties, do you still think you have a choice to choose? Even your way to look at it? We are not victim of fate, at least not totally. We are making choice every minute, just the options given are often under the framework of fate. When you have a better fate, you have better options and thus you have a better sense of self-creative and the feelings that your life is in your hand. On the contrary, when you do not have quite a good framework of fate, you have worse options and thus feel like you cannot choose and have the feelings that your life is out of control. Even though I believe I am lucky enough to make most choice that are really what I want it to be, I cannot deny the fact that “fate” is still the main key to determine one’s everything even one’s outlook on life. After all, as stated above, people do not even have a choice on whether or not they believe in the ability to change their life by making choices, instead, this belief is influenced by their “fate”. Therefore, Alfred Adler (1958)’s idea of creative self cannot generalise everyone’s experience and thus is defective. | | |
| 這是一首很感人的歌, 記得第一次聽到時, 在街上被當中的歌詞感動到雙眼濕透, 幾乎眼淚也滴出來. "you are a part time lover and a full time friend" 世上有多少人能讓你有這種感受? 說的不是只有你的情人, 而是每一個了解你而, 同時love you for who you are的人, 每一個世界誤解你時會告訴你他們相信你的人 才會don't see what anyone can see, anyone else but you. 這種愛每人生出就起碼有一個,就是媽媽, 媽媽就是那種 "part-time lover+full time friend"的角色, 在你沒情人時, 她是你的full time lover因為她總不計較你會有天離去找自己的"full time lover", 當你有lover時, 她就是那個最為你著想的full time friend. 另一個這樣的人, 就是你的lover, 我想這不用多說, 在他們眼中, 即使別人笑你醜, 他們寧願說自己也醜, 為的就是要與你相配, "We sure are cute for two ugly people" 這些千絲萬縷的付出, 真是用一世也回報不了, 只好借這兒的空間,這首歌的歌詞, 跟你們兩個說: " thanks for everything, thanks for the stage you two have given me and thanks for being my fans. even i don't have any other fans, you two have completed my life. I Love YOU!"
Kimya: You're a part time lover and a full time friend The monkey on you're back is the latest trend
Adam: I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Adam: I kiss you on the brain in the shadow of a train I kiss you all starry eyed, my body's swinging from side to side I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Kimya: Here is the church and here is the steeple We sure are cute for two ugly people I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Adam: The pebbles forgive me, the trees forgive me So why can't, you forgive me? I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Kimya: I will find my nitch in your car With my mp3 DVD rumple-packed guitar I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you Both: Du du du du du du dudu Du du du du du du dudu Du du du du du du dudu du
Kimya: Up up down down left right left right B A start Just because we use cheats doesn't mean we're not smart I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Adam: You are always trying to keep it real I'm in love with how you feel I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Kimya: We both have shiny happy fits of rage You want more fans, I want more stage I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Adam: Don Quixote was a steel driving man. My name is Adam I'm your biggest fan I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Kimya: Squinched up your face and did a dance You shook a little turd out of the bottom of your pants I don't see what anyone can see, in anyone else But you
Both: Du du du du du du dudu Du du du du du du dudu Du du du du du du dudu du But you | | |
|